Click <A href="javascript:window.history.back()">here</A> to return whence you came to this page :)
<table border=1><td><b>- - = # <font size=5><font color=#ff0050>Ideal(s?)!?</font></font> # = - -</b><tr><td align=center>
<i>(to a dying model)</i></table><br><br>
<table border=0><td><pre>
 the idea is like just one interest, 
 it - from Information Technologies - 
                it ignores all
  but their own invigorating idea 
     is increasingly -- 
  is the irreplaceable ineptitude 
         like an incredible idealism? 
       Would you pay 172 dollars for an ideal? 
  an insipid irresistible ink - to at least one intoxicating insanity, 
      listen to my words: 
 too many invigorating ideals 
     ignored...
          an idealism 
 resembles 
 an imaginary intoxicating id of it 
              a generous golden grunt gets gently, 
          an immoral imagination 
 is similar to an interlocking imagination 
        intelligence is an interest. 
 an incredible interest 
                     ill of interest 
 - to the idea 
 
         why did 
         an intellectual infant inch to intelligence? 
 because intelligence is intellectual. 
                    love is similar to an imbecile: 
                    the insipid idea - to it 
        too many ideas are like the idea. 
      she ignores 
     she is 
     she is 
     she is
     a rose
 
  must fewer imitations interconnect? 
 must irreplaceable ideals 
     increasingly intellectualize? 
 
            must an idealism inch to the ineptitude? 
     
        imaginary ideas: any imitations 
 why does the ignorant infant inch to intelligence? 
             because that infant is also irreplaceable. 
 how is her incredible insanity like an inspiring interlocking ideal? 
             no insect ignores insanely! 
        a romance is a kind of the interesting idiot: 
 both are ignorant. 
   </pre><tr><td align=right>
Moon Steer, 1996</table>